Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (66356)	11/12/2002 11:43:22 AM
From: YlangYlangBreeze	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

So you're saying it was stupid women who voted for Clinton? perhaps women are less qualified to vote? Is that where you're headed with this? There's this element of elitism as you talk about qualifications for voting, and it is furthered by your assertion that Clinton got by on his good looks, as perceived by women. It so happens that Clinton was better on women's issues. Likewise Gore. So re the male vote, maybe Bush, despite his weak chin and little rat voice benefitted from the male anti-choice vote? Or the Christian traditional value and roles vote, what with his suzee homemaker "little woman" twit of a kinnergarten teacher wife who knows her god-ordained place and stays in it. Maybe it was the macho (male) World Peace Through Military Domination vote? Or maybe it was the ugly men coalition that wasn't threatened by his hatchet face, and Laura's panting Pekingese demeanor? EDIT: I'm outta here. It's sunny and I have better things to do... will try to check in later. Do you have some sort of gross facial or physical deformity that has led to this chip on your shoulder about good looks?