SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (154734)11/12/2002 7:28:57 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1580154
 
I believe that the Middle East requires a comprehensive, unbiased plan to fix smoldering issues, beginning with Israel/Palestine.

Why would one begin with the one issue that is clearly not going to be solved in the next few hundred years? Why not attack a problem that CAN be solved?

The United States is NOT (EVER) going to solve the problem of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. Why would you suggest that as a precondition to dealing with other issues in the region?



To: Alighieri who wrote (154734)11/12/2002 8:40:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Respond to of 1580154
 
Al, here's my problem with every single one of your posts on this subject. I see you identifying the problems and formulating the requirements of a solution, but I don't see you actually putting forth a solution.

Of course you want to resolve fundamental grievances that date back to Biblical times. Of course you want to subdue the anger of the Arabs. Of course you want to build up a spirit of peace, democracy, and brotherhood in the Middle East. Who doesn't want all that?

I state the obvious: The Middle East is already a huge mess, and not even the combined efforts of the free world will solve it. All the rest of the world can do (besides self-defense) is take actions that amount to either carrots or sticks. Ultimately, it's up to the Middle East itself to come out of the cycle of self-destruction.

Tenchusatsu