SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (56854)11/12/2002 11:27:57 PM
From: paul_philp  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 

His only real option is to go offshore, and get foreign allies -- Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, other terror cells -- to try something elsewhere, where no one is expecting it. The strikes, if they come, will be at a great distance -- in the U.S. or Europe or India or South-east Asia or elsewhere in the Middle East; desperate and essentially hopeless attempts to distract from the main show; to get the world to say, "You see, Mr. Bush, Iraq is not the problem!"


Eh, voila - OBL shows back up on the scene. Mr. Warren looks prescient on this call.


To put this more plainly: from Baghdad, it could easily be, onward to Riyadh.


Great Canadian minds think alike. ;-)

Paul



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (56854)11/13/2002 4:19:22 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
>>The strikes, if they come, will be at a great distance -- in the U.S. or Europe or India or South-east Asia or elsewhere in the Middle East; desperate and essentially hopeless attempts to distract from the main show; to get the world to say, "You see, Mr. Bush, Iraq is not the problem!"<<

Wonder if this was written before the latest bin Laden tape surfaced. If so, very prescient.

Edit: I see I was not the only one to come to this conclusion.;^)