Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gulo who wrote (5727)	11/13/2002 9:36:14 AM
From: ddl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6016

Thanks Gulo, again good post. What I can't understand is why would a company advertise itself as being "in the market, having a product" with "mou's" and test units going to "GM" and "Enbridge"... If the darn thing can't even last long enough to cover the installation cost? If you can't do that, you got nothing to start with! It's like Tathacus advertising they got a new way for electrolysis... only problem is it might take more power in than you get out. Everything degrades, but by the Jesus, you should know before you go and open your mouth if the thing can at least get out of the gate. Hellloooooooooooo!!!

To: Gulo who wrote (5727)	11/13/2002 2:26:06 PM
From: the Chief	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6016

Fuel cells have come an astonishingly long way in the last three years, and GLE is definitely in the front ranks. They have set record after record for energy density and have excellent reliability compared to most peers. That does not mean the technology has been perfected yet. Can you substantiate that statement or are you just regurgitating what you have heard here? I have yet been able to compare densities to other fuel cells to determine who is truly better, they all seem to select their own way to quantify how good they are...re : density/power.