Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (154754)	11/13/2002 4:02:15 PM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578890

Al, I will yield to your unbiased opinion. I never claimed my opinions were unbiased. I was just hoping that you would follow through with the premise of: ... And will America appreciate the consequence of such policies only when inevitably they lead to the recruitment of terror and additional terrorist acts perpetrated on American soil and people? If you are saying that some consequences (9/11) are not the direct result of actions of the US (Clinton), than it undermines your "Blame America for everything" argument. Let's go through the permutations: no action = no consequences: We can forget this one no action = some consequences: Discussed above. If this is possible, your Blame America First argument falls apart, because the Blame America First crowd "knows" that America is to blame for everything negative. some action = no consequences: A direct repudiation of your statement some action = some consequences: Then some of Clinton is to blame for 9/11. The reason I am curious about this is because I hear a lot of arguments from Dems revolving around this theme. Joe