Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (150042)	11/13/2002 10:13:01 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

All that is NOT an answer to the question, is it Victor? To refresh your memory, here is the question: >>Oh so your "summary" is more credible than the president of a >>petroleum consulting company who has also, incidentally, worked with >>NSA for a period on energy security issues? Who are you, if you don't mind me asking, >>and why should your opinion count more than that of Mr Pugliaresi? Message 18227223 >>US 'dependency" on ME oil is a myth. Are you for real? You mean the US is on good terms with Saudi Arabia, for example, because they are nice and friendly, and their democratic view of the world is so parallel with the US, like with England? What, even after so many Saudi citizens made darts out of planes which they subsequently zonked into certain towers and killed some thousands of people in the process, the US goes and pulls a "regime change" on Iraq but sends only flowers to Saudi Arabia and the US is NOT dependent on ME oil??? >>Plus, the OPEC nations cheat. They regularly exceed quoatas Really? Shame on them! And I always thought they were oh so honest :) Who cares, Victor? What is your point?