SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Maximum Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard Bennett who wrote (44)11/14/2002 6:12:13 AM
From: Robert Scott  Respond to of 81
 
At the outset, it is certainly better to be in a creditor situation than debtor but I think the way to view it is like a business or individual. Consider the GDP as the revenue or gross income and the national debt as the debt. GDP is around 40 trillion and the debt is around 4 trillion or about 10% of annual revenue. If the interest expense on the debt is around 200 billion, then you can see that the situation is not unmanagable. We saw how quickly the annual deficit can be erased - it took around 5 years in a fairly strong economy. If the govt had any discipline in spending, there would be a small deficit in times like this. The other thing to keep in mind is that we do not want the govt to run a surplus for long - it saps capital out of the economy. Greenspan discussed this in detail last year. Pay down the debt that makes sense to pay down, then cut taxes if you're still running surpluses. The capital is much better used by companies which will in turn create higher GDP.



To: Howard Bennett who wrote (44)11/14/2002 6:16:02 AM
From: Robert Scott  Respond to of 81
 
As far as trade deficits, I really don't understand the real effect one way or the other. A declining or rising dollar has both good and bad effects. I think the most important thing is that it be gradual whichever way it is going.