Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (154806)	11/14/2002 8:21:49 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583507

Don't you think that at this point, it is up to Saddam to decide if there will be war or not. I think Bush and the UN pretty clearly outlined the path Saddam needs to take to avoid war. No I don't. It is abundantly clear that Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld have dismissed that inspections and containment is a viable path. Don't make me go dig up speeches and rhetoric which is in plentiful and we have all heard. It is also abundantly clear that Bush went to the UN only under severe world and domestic (from his own party) negative opinion. Let's not try to fool anyone here. Bush has been steered from both sides of the argument and Powell has quietly won the tug of war so far. Even generals within the administration have counseled openly (Zinni quite openly) against a path of war. Avoiding war is a responsibility on both sides. Al