Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AUTOHOME, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spartex who wrote (29954)	11/14/2002 8:58:01 AM
From: Spartex	Respond to of 29970

con't.....(of a trip down memory lane)... that the value of good companies peaks in years five through 10. Former employees cite many reasons for the failure of Excite At Home -- a relatively inexperienced chief executive, a series of bad acquisitions that nearly wiped out the company's cash reserves, board members who represented cable companies, specifically AT&T Corp., that sometimes had different interests. More than a few believe the idea of merging a Web portal with a cable company was flawed from the beginning. Regardless of who is to blame, the impact on shareholders was the same: Those who believed in Doerr's optimistic view wound up losing everything. No More Predictions In recent months, Doerr has all but gone into hiding. Kleiner, like other surviving venture capital firms, continues to invest but does so much more conservatively. Some of Kleiner's limited partners are upset with the firm because returns are negative. The trade press has begun to write only about Kleiner's failures rather than about new companies Kleiner is funding. Doerr, like practically every other director of a public business that has been suffering from the stock market's downturn, must now contend with corporate fraud lawsuits and government investigations into Kleiner-backed companies. He is being sued by shareholders of Amazon, Freemarkets, Drugstore.com and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. At least three Doerr-backed firms, Martha Stewart, Homestore and AOL, are being scrutinized by regulators. University of Wisconsin law professor D. Gordon Smith believes that most of the flurry of lawsuits against venture capitalists such as Doerr are unfounded. "When something bad happens we wonder whether someone was evil or stupid. I think it's pretty clear that most of the VCs were not in the first camp. They were not manipulating markets," Smith said. "What they were doing was taking advantage of the situation." Former congressman Rick White, a Republican from Washington state and a friend of Doerr's, insists that Doerr's views are essentially unchanged. "We don't talk about the New Economy anymore," White said, "but Doerr is a guy who still believes there is a physical power in tech." The past few times Doerr spoke to a public audience, earlier this year and in 2001, he gave almost identical speeches. He started by saying he had come with "somewhat of an apology" for some of his previous comments. He then flashed slides of his famous "greatest legal creation of wealth" quote and revised it to say "greatest legal creation (and evaporation) of wealth." But what may be more telling is what he is not saying. Doerr has stopped trying to predict the future. There isn't, and hasn't been for some time, talk of the next new thing in technology. Researcher Richard A. Drezen contributed to this report. © 2002 The Washington Post Company

To: Spartex who wrote (29954)	12/1/2002 7:32:35 PM
From: E. Davies	Respond to of 29970

@Home shareholders cite AT&T "fraud" news.com.com By John Borland Staff Writer, CNET News.com November 14, 2002, 9:36 AM PT Aggrieved investors in the defunct Excite@Home cable modem service said a months-long investigation has uncovered new evidence that AT&T engaged in "fraud" and corporate "technology theft." Shareholders suing AT&T and former company directors filed an amended complaint in New York federal court last Thursday, with new details of alleged wrongdoing based largely on interviews with former Excite@Home employees, including ex-CEO Patti Hart. The amended complaint claims that top AT&T executives engineered a plan to steal key intellectual property that was used to develop a competing broadband network. According to the complaint, AT&T created its own cable Internet experiments called the "Steamboat Project" as early as February 2000, and by the next month, the company "had a plan to copy and convert Excite@Home's technology." Attorneys representing the plaintiffs said the amended complaint includes crucial new evidence in the case. "We did not feel like we should go to court without having a lot of hard evidence we could point to," said Frank Thomas, chairman of the shareholders' group legal subcommittee. "We all talked about (AT&T's role) and had theories about it, but now we're able to substantiate it." AT&T declined to comment on the pending suit. The shareholders' class-action suit is just one still pending over the company's demise, which played out as one of the dot-com years' most dramatic Icarus stories. Even a year after customers have found their way to other service providers, the company's story remains a magnet for critics convinced that parts of the dot-com free fall could have been avoided. Excite@Home, once the largest broadband Internet service provider, collapsed into insolvency a year ago amid allegations by shareholders and bondholders that AT&T had helped engineer, or had at least profited by, the company's failure. As Excite@Home went into bankruptcy last year, AT&T offered to buy the assets of the struggling company. Bondholders and shareholders cried foul, saying that it wasn't a good deal and that AT&T had pushed Excite@Home into accepting bargain-basement prices. The deal ultimately fell through in part as a result of the opposition. As the company collapsed, AT&T, Comcast and Cox Communications all said they were transferring subscribers to their own cable modem networks--in AT&T's case, built in just a few weeks, the company said. According to the shareholders' complaint, AT&T's network was actually the result of much more than a year's worth of effort, in which the company systematically extracted critical proprietary networking information from Excite@Home with the aim of constructing its own competing network. Siphoning out knowledge? According to last week's amended complaint, AT&T concealed a plan to raid Excite@Home technology under the auspices of an "open access" experiment aimed at letting rival ISPs offer service over its cable network. A network designer working on the so-called Steamboat Project had warned Excite@Home management in July 2000 that AT&T was using the trial "as a means to take and convert Excite@Home's proprietary technology and that Steamboat posed a direct threat to Excite@Home's business." The complaint cites specific instances, beginning in January 2001, in which AT&T personnel asked for and copied key Excite@Home software and data, including provisioning databases and engineering and planning documents. Some of these efforts met with protests by Excite@Home employees, which were ultimately overridden, the shareholders allege. By spring and early summer, well before the service providers had reached the early throes of bankruptcy, AT&T was already rerouting some Excite@Home traffic through AT&T servers, a change that made the ultimate transition of customers to AT&T's network a simpler task, the shareholders said. Much of this later action happened under the guidance of Hossein Eslambolchi, installed by AT&T in February 2001 as Excite@Home's "interim vice president of broadband services" and tasked with strengthening a network that was prone to failure. Eslambolchi's role had previously been questioned by critics who charged he helped build AT&T's own network with knowledge gleaned from Excite@Home. "Once we got in and started to investigate, we found there was corroboration for virtually every part of the speculation" about AT&T's role in Excite@Home's collapse, said Rick Rayle, a Lovell & Stewart lawyer serving as the chief investigative attorney for the shareholders' group. However, AT&T and some Excite@Home insiders have previously said Eslambolchi's work simply brought badly needed stability to a shaky network. The experienced AT&T engineer--now the head of AT&T Labs-- had no need to tap Excite@Home for networking knowledge, AT&T insiders have previously said. Shareholders also alleged, based on interviews with former CEO Hart, that Excite@Home's financial strength had been badly overstated in the final months before bankruptcy. The complaint cites Hart as saying that subscriber and revenue growth projections--largely those made by AT&T--were inflated by as much as 30 percent over what the company could justify internally. The group leading the class-action suit comprises about 200 individual shareholders who have incorporated themselves to pursue the action. They allege that the actions outlined in their complaint are evidence of securities fraud on the part of AT&T, directors and former executives of Excite@Home. No court date has been set for hearing the allegations laid out in the complaint. The case is being heard in the New York Southern District federal court.