SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Thermoelectric - SOFC Fuel cells (GLE:TSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gulo who wrote (5739)11/14/2002 11:49:14 AM
From: ddl  Respond to of 6016
 
I quit averaging down. Too many loosers these days, and GLE the way they've been behaving lately are placing themselves on the list.... top scientist goes, Pres gone, now we hear of delays, problems, all for what?... We haven't heard the truth yet, but the price fall says someone has....

Anyway... About the Chief's comments on a huge stack built from low watt cells being as good or better than a small 1.5w/cm cell.....
Is this reasoning correct. I mean, is hydrogen burnt depending on the surface area of the cell stack. Or is it depnedent upon the efficiency of the cell?



To: Gulo who wrote (5739)11/14/2002 11:58:45 AM
From: ddl  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6016
 
Gulo, btw...
That $1,000 / kw cost for the hydro project. Is this how that works?
In one year, that 1 kw generator can produce 365x24hr = 8,760 kwhrs.
In Ontario I will be paying 5.3c / kwhr which means that if I burn 8,760 kwhrs in a year I will have paid $464.28 for that $1,000.00 investment?
Payback in 2 years?
regards