Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Goldberry who wrote (4844)	11/14/2002 2:06:14 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

HI Graham, We appear to have crossover in storage volumes now with 7 weeks to spare, excellent. highlandenergy.com OT: I`m on a diet as posted. No need for the ignore. I just need to exercise a little self control. Hell if I can quit smoking after 20+ years how hard can it be eh! (10 years quit now). regards Kastel

To: Goldberry who wrote (4844)	11/15/2002 1:04:42 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

John quite a few people have Peter on ignore which cuts down on the crapola except when others respond. ----- And quite a few people dont. As my private messages attest to. Seems some actually think real hard fact and hard data concerning the trusts is of great importance to them. GO FIGURE.----- Glad to see you ignored my take on NT. As that discussion with Lorne proves. That provided real gains into a few lurkers pockets. As it has provided those who think accumulating the trusts on weakness following a specific math strategy can and does provide the meat of high monthly current income. That only grows and grows with all that accumulating. And the added gravy of the cycling higher of unit values which has been demonstrated over and over again with the past trust trading data ---------------- Now if Scot, Lorne, Kastel and others would put Peter on ignore we could seriously cut down on the nonsence posts. -------- The nonsense comes from those that try to take apart or attack my strategy. Because they cant do that with any sort of math or hard trust data. I look to all the recent posts of others and there is not one single mention of how all the news reported or fact tidbits that are presented can be incorporated into something tangible that one can use to guide his purchases and or sales of units. Are trust units prices over bought or over sold, high range or low range. Readers and investors are only getting half the story. And getting half the story means that their results are going to be 50-50 at best. Ask any of those who have presented stuff here of recent what they have presented here all means in terms of something quantifiable and tangilble to trust prices. And its always the same. They think this or think that. Or feel this or feel that. But cant or wont provide anything of real substance joe average trust investor can use or needs to make his choices of what he is to do any easier or any more successful. -----------------