SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tommaso who wrote (4851)11/14/2002 5:09:40 PM
From: Scott Mc  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 11633
 
Even when the fee might be 1% it is still worth pursuing, e.g.

A 100K property after expenses might generate $5K revenue
Management 3% of $5K = $150

Sell a 100K property and get 1% of sale
Fee 1% of $100K = $1000

Big incentive, there are no easy answers, although even 3% is high because if you think about it the 3%(or whatever) is on top of the costs of providing the service. E.G. if you hire a Property Manager you pay 5% total, here you are paying 3% to manage the property manager(so to speak)
Scott



To: Tommaso who wrote (4851)11/15/2002 12:47:58 AM
From: whitepine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 11633
 
re: NCN

I remain puzzled about its price. Considering the opportunity cost of investing in US gov bonds, or other G-7 bonds, the rate of return on NCN is a no-brainer. However, the market doesn't price it in that way. From the 7.20 range, the price has slipped to 6.9+ range.

Why?

whitepine


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News