As I said I called out what I saw as stupid and narrow minded thinking and you have confirmed completely I understood your stupid and narrow minded thinking.
Riight, and as I've said, I don't consider it exactly prudent to accept the religious pronouncements of a two bit engineeer over the clear pronouncements of Islamic clerics who chant for the death of America and of Islamics who literally destroy innocent lives across the earth.
You based upon a feeling judge and condemn others.
Riight, and you fail to use your God-given brain, assuming you have one, to evaluate the facts before you. As I've said, I don't consider it exactly prudent to accept the religious pronouncements of a two bit engineeer who will not see the clear evidence of individuals being bombed across the world in the named of Islam.
I judge others based upon their actions, and as with any sane individual I profile those posessing the traits of people who are known to repeatedly destroy innocent folks. If that is "feelings" for you, then you really need to join the Democrats because you dang sho ain' got brains enough even to be a Republican.
You state PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH is a liar.
False. I stated that he employed lies strategically, as effective tools of war. He is a politician and politicians do this all the time, especially in times of war. You apparently lack the philosophical depth of mind to see the friggin difference here. If you've ever really designed anything of value, then I hope you've put your dang name somewhere on it so I can be dang sure to avoid it.
Your positions are clear to me, I consider them idiotic.
And I don't consider it exactly prudent to seriously entertain the judgments of a two bit engineeer who appears to speak English as a second language, over the clear pronouncements of Islamic clerics who chant for the death of America in the name of Islam.
The false logic and rationale you use promotes intolerance, hate, death and destruction. Your opinion go beyond reasonable caution to intolerance.
Spoken like a true friggin' leftist. Folks be employing the facts, and leftists start frothing at the dang mouth, calling folks "intolerant" and "bigots" while criminals take flying lessons in their own friggin back yard in preparation for murdering thousands of lives.
The islamics have literally destroyed thousands of lives right here in America and are being repeatedly caught by federal authorities trying to murder more, and clowns are running around talking crap about reasonable folk going beyond reasonable caution. You be trippin' man.
You cannot see this, my guess is that you never will. The fact that I am arguing with you says I donot believe Islam is a religion of hate and violence.
Well, hehe, I gotta tell ya tommy, you ain't arguing. I have laid out the support for my position repeatedly here and you have utterly failed to refute it. At best you've only said my position is "stupid and narrow-minded." But the problem with this is it ain' no argument. It is just a leftist's means of dealing with facts.
It is just an empty-headed opinion on something about which you obviously know very little. And your little faith-enhanced drug of a belief on Islam ain't no argument either. It is just a belief, one based on your personal feelings. There is a well-established pattern of mass-murder among Islamics and I have shown the reasonableness of profiling based upon this pattern. In response, you have thrown up no argument at all, no reasoned rebuttable, but only a bunch of leftoid rants about "intolerance" and "hate," as if throwing around such words really means diddly. You be trippin' maaan.
If I donot, because of all I have seen in life, then why cannot this be the honest position of PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH.
Such goofy leftism ought to be a source of profound embarrassment to you. But I see this is impossible, since to understand it will require of you possession of far more sophistication than you've demonstrated here.
I think Bush's statements on Islam could be honest, but I do not think they are because I think, unlike a certain wannabe engineer, Bush just ain't that stupid. I believe he sees the facts and as the leader of the current war knows he had better strategically lie to pacify both American muslims and muslims abroad. It just does not cost much to spread such propaganda especially if it will mollify muslims everywhere as he hammers th muslims in Iraq. Now that is really not my overall argument and I marvel that I have had to clarify it for you so many times when others caught it immediately. My position on Bush's statements is just a belief based upon Bush's actions prior to the recent UN resolution. If it offends you that I think a president can lie, then you need to grow up pal. Presidents have lied before in war. It can be very useful as we see here with Bush's preparations against Iraq.
Or will you argue that I am lying as any who ..... well you would have to fill in the blank.
No tommy, rest your little head. I ain' arguing that you are lying. It takes brains to lie.
In that really nothing has happened in the US the result of some conspiracy since 911, Why have not all these millions of hating evil Muslims wreaked more havoc.
Dear me. I sincerely cannot believe you've said this here. And it ought to be a warning to the rest of you in the forum of the ubiquity of invincible ignorance. This guy has actually claimed nothing conspiratorial has really happened in the US since 911 when the fact is the feds have been trailing terrorist operatives in upstate NY, Virginia and elsewhere for the last year. This guy has actually asked "Why have not all these millions of hating evil Muslims wreaked more havoc.", as if that supported his position when it has been documented that the pattern of terrorist support amongst American muslims has been through mosques and muslim charities.
This guy has actually asked "Why have not all these millions of hating evil Muslims wreaked more havoc", as if that supported his position, though vast quantities of American investigatory might and resources are even now being expended to stop such havoc. Why are so many American resources being expended? Because of muslim terrorism. Feds, even now are publishing warnings all across America because of recent threats of muslims and claims of having cells planted in America who are ready to destroy innocent Americans. Those claims alone represent conspiracy and terrorism, they are after 911 and they refer right here to muslims in the good ol' US of A.
This guy has actually asked "Why have not all these millions of hating evil Muslims wreaked more havoc" as if the havoc they have already wreaked hasn't been quite enough for alarm, this, even while the Islamics are claiming right friggin' now to be in position to take off more of our heads. I say it not for theatrics but of sincere concern. I think too many Americans have quite lost perspective. When tens of thousands of Americans now begin to enter a second Christmas season mourning the loss of loved ones at the wicked hands of Islam, and when islamics claim even recently to be ready to assault America, and when Islamics have been repeatedly caught attempting to harm us since 911, even funding terrorists in American mosques and other organizations, then when Americans foolishly ask "why worry! the islamics haven't done much else since 911?" it seems a certain indication that Americans no longer value their own lives and values. They have gotten used to being treated like shiite by the Islamics. Well, I'm not used to it and never will be.
One wacked sniper. It should be obvious to all that unless a person is super stupid, one can snipe off folks forever.
It should really be obvious that the claim someone can snipe off folks forever, as if sniping is easy, is itself super stupid. Humans need a support network, snipers included. The snipers were caught because their support network was not very good and ultimately broke down. That is why they were hungry, sleepy and hadn't had a shower in several weeks. You really need to get a dang clue.
And besides, that sniper himself was a dang muslim from right here in America. Were muslims all over America to turn to snipering, then it would certainly draw attention upon muslims, exposing them too greatly. Your suggestions here are as inept as ever.
The most effective way of assault is to do precisely what the muslims are doing - fund well-trained groups of state detached terrorists through mosques and other groups, plant them in civilized countries supported by muslim communities, then craft assaults that would really shake the country at its foundation. In this way, when Americans turn their eyes upon muslims in general, the muslims can legitimately cry innocence. I don't here claim all muslims are guilty, I am claiming there is a system in place that allows large numbers of muslim barbarians to exist within America using the muslim communal infrastructure as its base. And since muslims are not working hard to root out this problem, distinguishing themselves from it, it is prudent to be skeptical.
[Why aren't the muslims destroying] powerlines or other infrastructure. It is not difficult.
It also is not terribly effective.
How long did it take to capture the unibomber. Why did he get caught.? Why did the recent snipers get caught? Considering the millions of muslims living here, why are there not several incidents a year, a month, a week, a day.
Because terrorist cells are not interested in taking the dang potshots you've mentioned here (get a friggin' clue maaan). The unibomber was extremely limited, taking out (if he was lucky), one guy over several months or even years. You have these fantasies of knowing how to harm a society when the fact is, all the crap you've mentioned here is just a bunch of ignorant child's play. It ain't nuthin'.
Were muslims to take your approach then they really would be exposed and we'd see the enemy in stark terms. You are being ridiculous and betraying profound ignorance of strategy.
The muslims are obviously much smarter than this. They are employing exactly the "proper" approach. Average muslims ought not get directly involved with terrorism. It is instead their funds that are needed to support stateless terrorists. In this way, when islamics hit us, we are at a loss to hit back with any sort of effectiveness. Osama has killed literally thousands of us, and despite the fact that he has long been supported by Islamic nations, we have only been able to hit relative few of his folk.
His is a simple and effective approach. To thwart it, we need to be realistic about our enemies - not employ all these goofy leftist fantasies you've whined about here. |
