Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (66762)	11/16/2002 1:53:27 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

The aliases of the particular individuals involved are entirely irrelevant, of course. That was an attempted change of subject. Who did what and why they did it is the moral issue. We now know that you believe that an [unnamed] male not only "got off on" (to borrow your term for it) the sexual shit and harassment he pulled on some [unnamed] females, but that he got off on the social opprobrium, too; -- which explains why he resisted all the public and private attempts to end the social opprobrium he had garnered. Why would a beneficiary of a process of his own devising want to end it? He wouldn't. What he would want, naturally, would be to perpetuate it. He might even sue to be able to do that. Getting off is pleasure. It is now utterly clear and explicit, from your own words, that the person whom you have championed is the male who was getting what he wanted, and the ones you have ridiculed are the females whose deep distress and even illness was the cost of his gratification. X ice in Wonderland.