SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (66815)11/16/2002 8:11:56 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Why is group behavior solicited by and exciting to someone (it "gets him off") bad at all? Why do you rue it? Why not high-five the gratified gentleman?

Another important question:

Is it your premise, X, that Poet did not suffer (and Bill, too, necessarily) and did not become ill and did not require medical care as a result of the protracted treatment including sexual insinuation and allusions, threats, psychological frottage, references to her family life, allusions to her medical history, that CH meted out to her on these threads however often she told him to stop, told him explicitly that he was frightening her, continuing after weeks of peace when neither of them posted toorabout the other, when he threatened to sue SI?

Is that your premise? Poet did not have a relapse of the PTSD CH knew about, and knew the origins of?

If you are wrong, X, do you care?



To: epicure who wrote (66815)11/16/2002 8:52:30 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I hope you will answer my post. CH replied to it unsurprisingly.

Is your premise what I described?

And if you are wrong, do you care?