Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (67138)	11/18/2002 8:05:57 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

It would seem to me that such a remark implies that Chris is not a victim. It's at least theoretically possible that Chris could be a victim, as well as Poet. Not saying that he is, only that one does not obviate the other. So, no, I don't think my statement implies that. It doesn't speak to it at all.

To: Solon who wrote (67138)	11/18/2002 8:35:35 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

ou said that you didn't know of anyone who would deny that "CH behaved badly towards Poet resulting in damage". It would seem to me that such a remark implies that Chris is not a victim. So it is your belief that anybody who behaves badly toward a person resulting in damage can't be themselves a victim? What a narrow view of human interactions. Many victims lash out in ways that are out of proportion to the harm they have suffered and therefore do things that constitute bad behavior and cause damage. Not that I'm saying that's the case here at all. Just pointing out that your statement was totally illogical and contrary to human experience.