Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ikonoklast53 who wrote (25718)	11/19/2002 9:14:53 PM
From: P. Ramamoorthy	Respond to of 27311

goepling, Yeah, I recall Thomas and Betts. I doubt whether the scope of work agreement would require them in the loop at this time, that may cost additional delays. That is only an opinion. VLNC has to learn the "pains of producing the modules/prototypes according to TYC specs and working with OEM's like TYC Electronics for various installations and configurations" just as they learned from the N-Charge glitch from the NI plant. I do not know how TYC Electronics and Betts are structured as business units in the huge TYC conglomerate. TYC Electronics needs new business to bolster their revenues and report profits to the Corporate Office. If this test succeeds, may be they have the options of producing batteries in-house by Betts. jmo. Ram