Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (81781)	11/20/2002 10:40:44 AM
From: pavlov2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Should be a $1,000,000.00

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (81781)	11/20/2002 11:25:43 AM
From: tool dude	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 122087

Thanks Maurice its nice to add a small dose of truth to these bs story's,I hope AP sues the sh@t out of you bastids for any other misreported crapola.Anything for a story huh!A colleague?I need a puke bag to go any further!You want a great story-one that people cant put down-find AP call him up seek the facts tell the friggin truth-its much better reading and far more interesting!

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (81781)	11/20/2002 12:05:59 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Maurice, I think your article was horrible Trying to link Tony to Khashoggi and hinting at the Sept 10/11 thing is extremely low. Khashoggi and 911 are probably the things tony despises most. I'd expect huge lies like that from anonymous loonies on a message board but not someone who wants to be thought of as a real writer, or whatever it is that you do on your site there.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (81781)	11/20/2002 1:23:19 PM
From: mmmary	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Maurice, it looked like you were apologizing as you signed it. As you were the only one who posted it on tony's thread, I thought it was part of the retraction deal. Sorry. To avoid any further confusion in the future, maybe add a little note. I'd seen it on other threads here on SI but everyone made sure we knew they weren't the ones who wrote it. After finally tracking down the original article, it was written by Michael C. Ruppert. He should be ashamed of himself for writing such a horrible article.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (81781)	11/20/2002 9:44:46 PM
From: ghostpoet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

It's been changed again: fromthewilderness.com 56. Sept. 10, 2001 - This item has been removed solely at the request of the party previously named in this entry. Recent court proceedings – which occurred after the news story we had cited - have indicated that there was no connection between the story listed here, the person named therein and the attacks of 9-11-01. At the request of the previously named party, FTW has replaced the $1,000 reward with a $1,000 donation to The Childrens Defense Fund ( childrensdefense.org ) on behalf of the named party and the issue is now amicably resolved without any hard feelings between that party and FTW.