Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Precious and Base Metal Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I_C_Deadpeople who wrote (5490)	11/20/2002 9:57:10 PM
From: que seria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39344

That SWC news doesn't even mention possible cost savings from use of Norilsk's Russian "associates" on, er. . . with, the Stillwater mine employees! This may be a twofer: a slap in the face of the union while grabbing a lifeline. SWC may be one of the few North American minerals companies that could make Norilsk look good by comparison. Actually, with this move it is Southernera that never looked so good--not that I'd own a PGM play in this environment. With recent news, Stealth Minerals continues to look like a keeper, although it is very early. Should have bought more Wolfden when it fell down lately, but I'm waiting on the POG to see if my next gold stock buys are going to be at deep discounts to present prices: stockcharts.com[r,a]wbclyiay[pc10!c20!c40!b200!i!f][vc60][iub14!uk14!lc5!la12,26,9!lp14,3,3!lf!ll14][J7019515,Y]&listNum=3