Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (58053)	11/21/2002 4:50:54 AM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

your "analysis" said Bush et al were "correct" in what they are doing "whether you and I like it or not". That is not how analyses go. I think we are having a language problem. I think my "analysis" of what the Admin is going to do is "Correct." Meaning I believe that is what they are planning to do. It does not necessarily mean that I believe it is the right thing to do. Since the Admin is running things, they are going to be able to do what they have planned, whither you or I like it or not. were you not saying the other day that an evaluation of the US' Middle East policy is futile because its stance re Israel will never change? No, I said that an evaluation of the US' Middle East policy has has to include as one of its premises that the Admin's stance on Israel will never change. To do an evaluation of something based on a false premise is a waste of time. For some reason you refuse to understand this difference.