SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MSI who wrote (17088)11/21/2002 6:45:55 PM
From: MSI  Respond to of 93284
 
Bottom line: low yield of gov't paper is precisely due to the low risk (technically zero).

Higher yields are from higher risk, there's no free lunch. The increased valuations from trillions more in the market will be the same as the increased risk we saw in the dot-com bubble, except broadly spread and the bubble will deflate more slowly.

But you will still get less return on your cash in the market, one it's flooded with SS money. No one wants to deduct that decreased return, they'd rather ignore it.

The SS privatization issue is somewhat of a shell game with little net gain for the citizens, other than a one-time stock market ratchet in valuations. The real gainers aren't the citizens, it's those who hype the story for political gain, and intermediaries who are straining at the bit to handle the trillions of dollars in new accounts.

The only real solution is improving government efficiency and accountability. Which is what government officials at all levels fight against, tooth and nail.

It looks like the only way to accomplish that is by guerilla efforts by citizen groups such as ewg.org, who expose gov't accounting on websites, in spite of gov't attempts to keep it concealed.



To: MSI who wrote (17088)11/22/2002 1:42:51 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93284
 
Ordinary pension plans invest for both growth and stability. Long term, diversification is generally sufficient to keep things on an even keel. There is no reason for Social Security to eschew growth strategies, so long as they are prudent. The idea of taking it in steps is to make sure that there is no shock to the system, but that the new dollars can be absorbed without dislocations.....