Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (5954)	11/21/2002 6:23:07 PM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

He's saying the S&P hourly since Oct. 10 has traced out the entire daily pattern of 10-98 to early 2000.

To: 16yearcycle who wrote (5954)	11/21/2002 7:04:40 PM
From: illyia	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10157

Eugene. This is hard to explain, which is why Velo probably refrains, but I will try. Look at the total rise on the SPX (I personally favor the INDU, but it does not matter, and for a moment forget about E-wave anything). Make the chart very large and Daily or less. Go back before the 98 rise. Look at the pattern that is constant, regardless of rises and falls. Let your eyes unfocus if need be. Relax your mind. A pattern will emerge. It is not the pattern of five-up/three-down. It is another pattern. That is the pattern that Velo is talking about. Not size or direction: pure pattern. Size and direction are other matters, altogether. Pattern is one thing. Waves are another. As the waves move, the pattern moves along, too, but at a different rate. This creates the friction that results in the bumps we count. Like this: amasci.com I think many people observe this on their own, but few talk about it, because it is complex. Enough. i.