Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (322480)	11/22/2002 1:54:05 PM
From: Neeka	Respond to of 769670

Very well said Jewel o the West. M

To: one_less who wrote (322480)	11/22/2002 4:24:35 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

Fair calls, certainly. [Wow, I never thought to see reason here... then again, I know you <g>] Moenmac left himself open by rejecting any criticism of ANY CinC... but LOL, I wouldn't defend Clinton's integrity as a man of honour or personal credibility. As far as it went, I even think the impeachment was legalistically justifiable - I also think it was petty, irrelevant and a gross waste of a very valuable weapon against a PotUS who might genuinely misuse their powers. Howewver, I distinguish between the man and the leader. I could care less about someone's personal peccadilloes - so long as those don't disrupt or destroy his policies and leadership of the country, or subvert the office for personal gain or the illicit advancement of aims without national oversight or consent. There's a huge difference in both degree and kind between the 'crimes' of a Clinton (adultery? puh-lease...) and a Nixon, or for that matter a Poindexter or a North...