Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (41197)	11/22/2002 2:12:06 PM
From: Paul Shread	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

Those are important levels (I have 9077 on the Dow), but it's also worth noting that a double-bottom breakout in 1932 failed before the final leg down. By the way, Trannies put in a bullish divergence at the 1942 low by failing to take out their 1940 low. One of the bullish signs in October (and July) was that they never took out their Sept. 2001 low.

To: Caxton Rhodes who wrote (41197)	11/22/2002 3:07:12 PM
From: marketing1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 52237

How about the SOX? Doesn't anybody care about their sox anymore? <ggg> Don used to say Naz can't co anywhere without the SOX leading the way? SOX hasn't broken through aug top at 367 yet. Neither has the BTK at 402! - another of Don's favorites. but NWX has. So what does Don have to say? He never gives me enough warning when he opens up the chat room. But I saw his message re class 1 sell. does anybody have a quick synopsis? Ps for those who asked me to report about office leasing activity as a barometer of optimism and projected growth. My company is still doing very very well - BUT office leasing activity is still very very slow. NG.