Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 1:45:39 PM
From: SeachRE	Respond to of 769670

That looks like Tequilla with pretzels(his favorite)...hehehe

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 1:49:19 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

KL, Ever thought maybe he's trying not to be rude, or is following protocol, or better yet is drinking ginger ale!

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 1:52:01 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 769670

"Speaking of a fifth, here's our NO I DON'T drink anymore Pres drinking at the NATO conference. You lose credibility with me by posting this. It just looks mean.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 2:16:52 PM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Clinton has an IQ of over 600? Wow. (Didn't seem to make him very smart though, Hmmm?)

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 2:26:56 PM
From: SeachRE	Respond to of 769670

The NO I DON'T drink anymore Pres is just having a relapse. What's a couple bottles of Tequilla among friends???

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 3:08:13 PM
From: Bald Eagle	Respond to of 769670

You don't know what's in that glass. Even if it is alcoholic, he just said he didn't drink any more, did he say he drank any less? :-)

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 3:27:50 PM
From: Bill Grant	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

You have no idea what's in that glass. Moreover, the glass is full. He may just have touched it to his lips and put it down. Your message is shallow, petty, and mean-spirited.

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (322526)	11/22/2002 3:52:25 PM
From: Skywatcher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

And I thought the Publicans wanted LESS government! What a JOKE Pentagon to Track American Consumer Purchases Thursday, November 21, 2002 By Major Garrett Thursday, 21 November, 2002 WASHINGTON -- A massive database that the government will use to monitor every purchase made by every American citizen is a necessary tool in the war on terror, the Pentagon said Wednesday. Edward Aldridge, undersecretary of Acquisitions and Technology, told reporters that the Pentagon is developing a prototype database to seek "patterns indicative of terrorist activity." Aldridge said the database would collect and use software to analyze consumer purchases in hopes of catching terrorists before it's too late. "The bottom line is this is an important research project to determine the feasibility of using certain transactions and events to discover and respond to terrorists before they act," he said. Aldridge said the database, which he called another "tool" in the war on terror, would look for telltale signs of suspicious consumer behavior. Examples he cited were: sudden and large cash withdrawals, one-way air or rail travel, rental car transactions and purchases of firearms, chemicals or agents that could be used to produce biological or chemical weapons. It would also combine consumer information with visa records, passports, arrest records or reports of suspicious activity given to law enforcement or intelligence services. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is home to the Pentagon's brightest thinkers -- the ones who built the Internet. DARPA will be in charge of trying to make the system work technically. Rear Adm. John Poindexter, former national security adviser to President Reagan, is developing the database under the Total Information Awareness Program. Poindexter was convicted on five counts of misleading Congress and making false statements during the Iran-Contra investigation. Those convictions were later overturned, but critics note that his is a dubious resume for someone entrusted with so sensitive a task. Aldridge said Poindexter will only "develop the tool, he will not be exercising the tool." He said Poindexter brought the database idea to the Pentagon and persuaded Aldridge and others to pursue it. "John has a real passion for this project," Aldridge said. TIAF's office logo is now one eye scanning the globe. The translation of the Latin motto: knowledge is power. Some say, possibly too much power. "What this is talking about is making us a nation of suspects and I am sorry, the United States citizens should not have to live in fear of their own government and that is exactly what this is going to turn out to be," said Chuck Pena, senior defense policy analyst at the Cato Institute. Pena and others say the database is an even greater violation of privacy rights than Attorney General John Ashcroft's nixed proposal to turn postal workers and delivery men into government tipsters. No matter what protections Congress requires, Pena fears a database big enough and nimble enough to track the entire nation's spending habits is ripe for abuse. "I don't think once you put something like this in place, you can ever create enough checks and balances and oversight," Pena said. But proponents say big business already has access to most of this data, but don't do anything with it to fight terrorism. "I find it somewhat counter intuitive that people are not concerned that telemarketers and insurance companies can acquire this data but feel tremendous trepidation if a government ventures into this arena. To me it just smacks of paranoia," said David Rivkin, an attorney for Baker & Hostetler LLP. The database is not yet ready and Aldridge said it will not be available for several years. Fake consumer data will be used in development of the database, he said. When it's ready, Aldridge said individual privacy rights will be protected. But he could not explain how the data would be accessed. In some cases, specific warrants would give law enforcement agencies access, he said. But in other cases the database might flag suspicious activity absent a specific request or warrant, and that suspicious activity could well be relayed to law enforcement or intelligence agencies. "I don't know what the scope of this is going to be," Aldridge said. "We are in a war on terrorism. We are trying to find out if this technology can work." CC