SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : AL is Not a Human Being -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J.T. who wrote (678)11/23/2002 5:24:31 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 793
 
entry and exit rules are predetermined before the trade is made

The point at which Al cuts losses depends on the above

Al doesn't consider current trades a rout; he reserves judgement until the trade is closed

the IBM trade is a paper trade. Personally, I am short MSFT and QQQ. I usually maket the same trades that Al does, butnot always. Al is an experimetn, a learning process but overall this year has madde me money despite some bad trades. That's life! The IBM trade in particular was more experimental than most, and that was noted in the post at the time Al made the trade.

You were here on this thread giving me a hard time earlier in the year for some trades that were down. Those trades came back, made a profit, and showed Al to be a good trader. You don't visit this thread when Al makes good trades, only on the minority occasions when he has trades underwater.

Here is our last exchange:

In post 509 you asked about stops
In post 510 I told you where the stop was
In post 511 you asked "What went wrong?"
In post 511 You criticosed my stop
In post 511 You asked "Is this the first time All lost all discipline?" even though I had just told you where my stop was
In post 511 You advised me "Hope is a slippery slope"
In post 513 I explained Al's various rules for stops

Then the batch of three trades you were criticising went positive

In post 520 I asked what you thought of my stops. U never replied.
In post 522, referencing your comments on hope, discipline and "worst trade on the board" I said the following:

"Discipline maintained, hope not involved, 9.1% profit booked in well under a month. Have you any idea what kind of annual return that is?"

You never replied. That says a lot about your character.

The purpose of Al is to test ways of making money. Al does a good job of bringing value in that respect. What purpose do you serve; what value do you bring? Why are you here?



To: J.T. who wrote (678)1/29/2003 10:50:47 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793
 
Al's long suffering MSFT short has eventually come into profit, but there is no cover signal in sight.

IBM short still well under water but again no cover signal in sight and expected to be profitable before closed.

We seem to be setting up for a waterfall here. Market is dropping but sentiment still very bullish.



To: J.T. who wrote (678)2/7/2003 3:10:38 PM
From: Steve Lee  Respond to of 793
 
Al covers MSFT $46.51

The first gap from October closed