SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (67811)11/25/2002 12:55:18 AM
From: one_less  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
"But why does it matter to you?"

I thought it was quite obvious that she did it to illustrate and substantiate her point. She did an effective job. Why? Does it matter to you?



To: epicure who wrote (67811)11/25/2002 12:09:04 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I do have a "personal interest" in the CH matter, in the sense that I take a personal interest in it.

What I said I had no "personal invested interest" in was not, as you claim, "the CH matter," but was whether CH acknowledges or apologizes or not. I'm not checking back, but that's my recollection. You check it.

Whether my interested rises above "personal" to "personal vested" has to do with whether there's any skin off my nose.

I'd guess I have about as much of the "vested" kind of personal interest as you. No, less, because when I leave here I don't make cracks about this matter, but you and CH make constant...

needling

remarks.

As for my raising of the Edwarda issue, I believe you first called me 'nuts,' and then said I was 'scorched earth.'

I have imo shown that you are nuts and you are scorched earth.

If you don't want to have your personal and revealing publicly documented past behavior referred to, don't call others names that apply to yourself in one of your remarkable acts of projection.

Is it a violation of a RULE to mention past posts of yours? Isn't Rules all that matter to you?