SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (67817)11/25/2002 10:18:15 AM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I know too much confidential information about you...

To what "confidential information" about me that "[you] know" are you referring?

And of course I haven't saved NEARLY the number of Pm's and posts that you have.

I have saved no PM, not one, from you.

"PM's and posts" makes it seem as though I have, though, doesn't it?

Just like "PM's, ems and phonecalls" to tons o' folks makes it seem like the multiple PM's we both get plus one phonecall from me to a friend (and multiple non-PM/em communications to and from you to the same friend) are a veritable phonecall barrage-conspiracy!

Word play. I guess word play isn't against a RULE, however dishonest! In fact, the more dishonest, the cleverer, right?

X, pay attention. This is logic and physics: aliases can neither obey nor violate rules nor, for that matter, can they "have an interest in" rules. People do the former and you--your pronoun not your alias--do the latter.



To: epicure who wrote (67817)11/25/2002 10:22:13 AM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I repeat this question: To what "confidential information" about me are you so suggestively alluding? And where in heaven's name did you get these secrets to which you are so suggestively (and entirely irrelevantly to any prior conversation) alluding?