Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (58722)	11/25/2002 1:30:17 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

And ultimately that's Eli Lilly's goal, isn't it? To "destroy lives"?

To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (58722)	11/25/2002 4:48:04 PM
From: Condor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

OT Sneak-a-legislation President Bush is about to sign the Homeland Security bill, in which is contained a get out of jail free card for Eli Lilly. This is the part I cannot understand about US legislation. How can an abberation like that occur within a bill presented to the House and Senate? It doesn't seem to make any sense. Unless there's something I'm missing ( probably is) it is a deplorable situation. Surely subject matter should be stand alone in a bill? I would appreciate a bit of discussion from threadsters on this so that I can understand the rationalization. Thx C