To: aladin who wrote (58779 ) 11/25/2002 2:57:26 PM From: LindyBill Respond to of 281500 Good comment, IMO, on the profiling question, and the response to it. Edited from a NRO column. >>>>If efficiency in fighting crime comes at the cost of hurt feelings among some "community" or other, I am OK with that. I think, as a matter of fact, the "community" should be OK with it, too. Plenty of blacks are victims of black crime (in the case of homicide, for example, which black Americans commit at around nine times the nonblack rate, perp, and victim are of the same race around 90 percent of the time); Muslims were among the 9/11 victims (more than 50, according to this website). If the cost of fighting those things is, that young black professionals in smart cars get pulled over and asked to show their licenses more than old Asian women in 1993 Camaros, or that mosques come under discreet FBI surveillance now and then, I think law-abiding blacks and Muslims should bear those mild indignities philosophically. If you want to cherish a group identity, you ought to be ready to shoulder the cross that comes with it. Black Americans commit crimes at rates sensationally higher than nonblacks; terrorism is very nearly a monopoly of extremist Muslims. Most blacks are not criminals, of course, and most Muslims are not terrorists; but nonblacks are entitled, on perfectly rational grounds, to concentrate their suspicions on blacks, and non-Muslims on Muslims, in the relevant areas of their lives, as a matter of simple prudence. If you are black, or Muslim, your best response is to join with the rest of us to stamp out crime and terrorism. The actual approach of too many black and Muslim activists, however, is to deny the issues exist. Crime? Enron! WorldCom! Terrorism? Tim McVeigh! Tim McVeigh! As an approach to the horrible, civilization-corroding issues of crime and terrorism, these responses strike most of us as inadequate. To put it mildly.<<<http://www.nationalreview.com/derbyshire/derbyshire112502.asp