Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (67964)	11/25/2002 5:52:02 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I knew that, you silly! I just wanted it to be perfectly clear to anyone who might have forgotten. It would be the height of foolishness for me to do so, given what I've seen of you, and yours That's quite insulting, but means nothing: If you agreed, and the entities you are insulting violated the deal, you'd be free to recommence needling, n'est-ce pas? . I will never agree to any restriction on my speech, that is not in the TOU. Ever Gosh, you remind me of Patrick Henry! And you love freedom of speech soooo much that you won't even agree to restriction on CH's when it is against the TOU! oh yes, i fergot, you simply deny that his treatment of Poet was harassing, invasive of privacy, threatening, otherwise improper, or even harmful! and so... therefore... it is, According To The Sacred Rules Of Xland, NOT a violation of the TOU the way a vulgar word would be! So he should be able to keep "getting off on it" (your expression) as long as he wants. In Xland. And since to you it doesn't matter to you what "harmful" thing (including death, you've let us know, so no wonder Poet's illness didn't ruffle your feathers, i mean sheesh!) happens to "aliases," the harm and the threats the TOU prohibits doesn't...somehow... count. To you. Ah, the majesty of the Sacred Rules... but wait selectively applied it's kinda unmajestic