Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (68132)	11/25/2002 7:32:52 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I am, don't get me wrong. Your request to stop being bugged about a particular issue that most participants are willing to let lay to rest seems reasonable without making it a deal to stop bugging E. I think she even offered that. I think her request to have you stop making her feel uncomfortable with sexual references can be honored without making it part of a deal. When you found that she was uncomfortable with it why did you threaten to continue it if you don't get what you want? The two things are not equitable. The first discussing/debating the CH/poet issue or more accurately things related in the aftermath has become a broad topic. Also you left yourself free to discuss these things while blocking E's imput. It would be impossible to continue posting with out ever touching on some of the related discussion. The second is not a topical issue it is simply you threatening to unnerve E with suggestive posts to and about her. This is the exact objection that most of us had to most of your proposals to resolve issues with Poet.