SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (68221)11/25/2002 10:28:10 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 82486
 
"Which is it?

Resolvability or not? Terms?



To: epicure who wrote (68221)11/25/2002 11:01:30 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
You were going 3D, right? Not staying on SI?

To my isp?

The threat itself... was that 3D? Yes, if my emails were, that was.

Going further, to my isp, that's, like, really a 3D threat!

It would have been 3D if I'd sent the information about CH that they requested to his bar association ethics committee, identifying him.

It was 3D when he threatened to sue us. Well, "word play" suit-threat. You know how that works, don't you?



To: epicure who wrote (68221)11/25/2002 11:03:17 PM
From: E  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Please answer me a question.

How does a non-lawyer know when the threat is definitely not of a lawsuit when he or she gets 1st Notice, 2nd Notice threats from an attorney to take unpleasant action, action you won't like, against you? What's the clue?

And btw, what threatening thing we wouldn't like would my isp have done to us if you had carried through your threat to contact my isp?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News