SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (17962)11/26/2002 3:57:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
Right, because the inspection teams destroyed them. Were you asleep for the last decade?

Apparently you were....

usatoday.com

What Iraq had: Iraq gave two figures of how much mustard gas it produced: 3,080 tons and 2,850 tons. Iraq acknowledged extensive use of mustard gas against Iran during the Iran-Iraq war in the 1980s. Iraq told the U.N. it misplaced 550 mustard-filled artillery shells after the 1991 Gulf War. (oopss!!!)

And what about Anthrax?....

What Iraq had: Iraq acknowledged making 2,200 gallons of anthrax spores — enough to kill millions if delivered effectively — but U.N. inspectors determined Iraq could have made at least three times that much. As many as 16 missile warheads filled with anthrax are missing. Iraq also was working in the 1990s to produce a deadlier dry, powdered form of anthrax, inspectors say. That powder could be sprayed from aircraft, put into missile warheads or given to terrorists, inspectors say.

And what about Botulism??

What it does: In small doses, such as those in food contaminated with the bacteria, it can cause stomach cramps, diarrhea, blurry vision and muscle weakness which can advance to paralysis and death. If the toxin is applied in pure form — especially if it is inhaled — the paralysis and death can be very rapid. About 70 billionths of a gram is enough to kill if inhaled.

What Iraq had: Iraq acknowledged making nearly 5,300 gallons of botulinum toxin, most of which was put into missile warheads and other munitions. At least five missile warheads filled with botulinim toxin are missing.
(remember.. only 70 billionths of a gram can kill, if inhaled).

And btw, Thomas... with reference to flinging "nuclear weapons" at Iraquis, I found this little blurb from the UNSCOM reports rather amusing:

1m3 containers)
1.5 1) According to Iraq, 1.5 tonnes of VX were discarded unilaterally by dumping on the ground.


fas.org

Amazing.... (even with solar decomposition)

And some more highlights from the UNSCOM report:

According to Iraq, of the declared total quantity of over 20,000 tonnes of key precursors, 14,500 tonnes were used either for the production of CW agents or for the production of other key precursors for these CW agents. The rest, 5,650 tonnes, was not used in the production of CW agents, and therefore needs to be accounted for separately. (meaning it has not yet been accounted for and could have been used for CW).

Iraq's declarations on its total holdings of key precursors over the period of 8 years could not be fully verified due to the absence of sufficient evidence provided by Iraq and its foreign suppliers for Iraq's procurement and the consumption of key precursors in the production of CW agents prior to 1988, as declared by Iraq.

But MOST IMPORTANTLY Thomas.. Here is the UNSCOM report on Iraq's deliberate actions to thwart disarmament and the inspection process:

fas.org

In July 1998, an inspection sought to uncover information related to Iraq's production, storage, and disposal of chemical and biological weapons. Iraq had long denied that any documents on these topics were available. In the course of the team's inspection of Iraqi Air Force Headquarters inspectors located a document detailing the use of "special weapons" during the Iran - Iraq war. Immediately after its discovery, the document was seized from the Chief Inspector. Iraq has not responded to the demand, expressed by the Security Council, to return the document. Information in the document, recorded by team members, shows significant discrepancies between the amount of munitions Iraq claims to have consumed between 1983 and 1988, and the actual amount presented by Iraq in its official declarations.

That where the inspection process ended Thomas... With this "stand-off" between the Iraqi lies and deception about its program, and some inspectors who stumbled upon something they weren't supposed to...

That means Iraq is likely hiding substantial quantities of CW...

So maybe this has woken you up??

Or are you so intellectually dead, you barely rolled over and hit the snooze alarm??

Hawk



To: Thomas M. who wrote (17962)11/26/2002 7:34:18 PM
From: Machaon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
Two senior Hamas and Fatah leaders killed in IDF airstrike

jpost.com

"They were in the same room on the first floor of a building when a missile came through the window and exploded, rescue workers said."

With each death of a terrorist leader, there is one less terrorist who can strike at Israel or America; and one less obstacle to peace.



To: Thomas M. who wrote (17962)11/26/2002 7:53:25 PM
From: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23908
 
They did not destroy them all. The inspection teams were kicked out because they were getting too close to some real goodies.

Your distortions are as evil as islam



To: Thomas M. who wrote (17962)11/28/2002 12:38:29 AM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
because the inspection teams destroyed them. Were you asleep for the last decade?

Well, that's interesting since Saddam is NOW warning he will use some of those presumably destroyed chemical weapons should the US attack:

Irag admits plan to use chemical weapons
By Richard Beeston, Diplomatic Editor

IRAQ has given its first
warning to the West that it does possess weapons of mass destruction
and that President Saddam Hussein would be prepared to use them if his regime was threatened.

The remarks were a complete contradiction of the official Iraqi position. Baghdad has insisted repeatedly that it no longer has chemical, biological or nuclear weapons nor medium-range missiles.

Speaking in an interview with al-Quds al-Arabi, a London-based Arabic newspaper, an unnamed senior Iraqi official said that Iraq had used chemical weapons during the war with Iran and would use them again if necessary.

“When the regime was under intense attack in the Fao (Peninsula) and began to be under threat, it did not hesitate to use all the weapons of mass destruction in its possession,” the official told the newspaper in an article published on Tuesday.

“Similarly, when the people of Halabja, or some of them, became guides for the Iranian forces that tried to break the northeast (front), the regime did not hesitate to use chemical weapons. Do not expect us to stand idly by in the face of any aggression that seeks to destroy and banish us not only from the regime but also from life.”

The paper declined yesterday to name the source, who also gave details about preparations under way by the Iraqi military to defend itself in the event of war.

In spite of Iraq’s denials that it possesses chemical and biological weapons, it has been given until December 8 by the United Nations to make a full admission of its weapons of mass destruction capability. If it does not, the United States and Britain have given warning that they will disarm Saddam by force, if necessary.

British sources said yesterday that the newspaper interview appeared to confirm their strong suspicions that Iraq is concealing tonnes of chemical and biological weapons, about 20 Scud missiles and a secret nuclear programme.

“I am not surprised by these threats,” a British official said. “As we stated in our dossier earlier this year, there is strong evidence that Iraq is hiding chemical and biological weapons. They never accounted for huge stockpiles left over from the Gulf War and later development.”

Western military commanders take the threat of the use of these weapons on the battlefield very seriously, particularly if Saddam is cornered. “In strict military terms, these weapons are not very effective in killing and wounding an opponent,” a senior British military source said, “but the psychological impact on troops is tremendous.

“There are few soldiers who will stand and fight in the face of a chemical attack. We have to work on the assumption that Saddam has them and will use them.”

That assumption is based on Iraq’s behaviour during its war with Iran, when it used chemical weapons extensively against Iranian infantry on the southern front and to subdue Kurdish civilians in the north.

The Iraqis are said to have contemplated using biological weapons, in particular anthrax germs, as a weapon of last resort. Iraqi defectors also claim that chemical weapons loaded on to Scud missiles would have been fired against Iranian cities if the war had continued.

Before the Gulf War in 1991, President Bush sent a letter to Saddam giving warning that he would “pay a terrible price” if he used weapons of mass destruction against coalition forces. In the event, Saddam fired Scud missiles at Israel and Saudi Arabia, but always with conventional warheads.

American and Israeli forces are preparing defences against missile attacks. Anti-missile batteries have been sent to the region to defend the United States’s allies. Earlier this week the American military, with Israeli observers present, test-fired a Scud missile in California to study its trajectory and improve missile defences.<<
timesonline.co.uk