SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (17972)11/26/2002 9:06:53 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
I guess senility is kicking in for ya, Thomas...

You can't even remember what you wrote... namely the following:

Right, because the inspection teams destroyed them. Were you asleep for the last decade?

UNSCOM disagrees with this. They can't verify it credibly, and much of the documentation they have is only paperwork, not physical evidence that Iraq actually destroyed those weapons and/or chemical precursors.

I could care less who helped Saddam build Chemical weapons.. And I highly disagree that any US regime deliberately sought to help Saddam to develop CW capability to use against his own domestic population, let alone against anyone else...

However, it's the US that is taking the initiative to disarm Saddam... And it is those nations with substantial economic and oil interests in Iraq that have been opposing it...

Play the blame game all you want... That doesn't change the future, and it only continues to show just how shallow and superficial your cognitive process actually is...

Hawk



To: Thomas M. who wrote (17972)11/26/2002 9:11:07 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908
 
He's cited several relevant, credible sources which back him up quite squarely. That said, though, I'm entirely willing to consider your opposing contention if you can do the same.

Can you?

LPS5