Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (68565)	11/26/2002 9:41:47 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

So. Are we in agreement on the principle that a person who acts reasonably and is duped anyhow is not philosophically guilty, but one who fails to act reasonably and is therefore duped where he wouldn't have been duped if he had acted reasonably is philosophically at fault (in addition to the duper, whose fault isn't diminished or mitigated by the dupee's failure to act reasonably)? Have we in fact reached yet another point of agreement? If so, this is getting kind of scary. I'm not sure I want to be in TOO much agreement with you! <g>