Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (68592)	11/27/2002 12:23:34 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

as long as you understand that developing the bank robber story has nothing to do with the topic we started out to discuss. I agree it was a bad example, and we would have avoided all the argument if you had used my UPS deliveryman setting off the bomb example. Except that there there wasn't a duper and a dupee. As soon as you get a duper and a dupee you inevitably have to ask the question at what point should the dupee be dubious and questioning. So no matter what scenario you posit, we will have to examine it to see whether the dupee was truly innocent or should have exercised reasonable caution.