SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Martha Stewart's Omni (MSO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TI2, TechInvestorToo who wrote (33)11/27/2002 6:09:57 PM
From: Sr K  Respond to of 136
 
The "Wells" was bs. She didn't make a false statement under oath. The statement in question (dealing with a stop loss order) was made by a public relations representative.



To: TI2, TechInvestorToo who wrote (33)11/28/2002 2:55:30 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 136
 
I wish I knew. My understanding is that it's a 30 day notice to show cause why civil charges shouldn't be brought on insider trading. If they don't bring charges shortly, she may have shown cause which means the stock flies shortly. I'm hoping it comes back down so I can get back in.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News