SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ThirdEye who wrote (324170)11/30/2002 1:29:01 AM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769670
 
Yes

* * *



To: ThirdEye who wrote (324170)11/30/2002 2:00:44 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
The problem threatening America today, as you know, is NOT "business being held accountable", but greedy out-of-control tort lawyers being allowed to loot and pillage the American people like a barbarian horde. The defensive eyes of the nation must be turned against this growing cancer that threatens to destroy our laws, our economy, and our ability to defend ourselves against the external terrorist enemy.

The American public showed, in 2002 that they will not be denied in turning away this enemy, just as they overcame the vote fabricators and propagandists of 2000, who tried (and failed) to steal their executive branch.

The crisis of the tort lawyers-like the cancer it is-is far more intractable, because it infects the legal system on which our republic is based. Awareness of the threat is a first important step in eradication, and the American people showed that they have achieved the critical awareness in 2002.

The TREATMENT will come in steps, with desperate Senate Democrats defending every inch of ground that the barbarians have gained over 15 to 20 years. Bush and his team has proved adept and subtle at combating these entrenched enemies. It will be a major brawl in 2003. But, at the end of the day, Bush and his team will have turned the fight around, and it may well be a major mark in his very large and positive historical legacy...



To: ThirdEye who wrote (324170)11/30/2002 2:23:19 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
What, exactly, do you think "insurance" is? It is a pool of funds craeted by various components in the productive sector of the economy to protect the ongoing business and property TO WHICH YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE OWE THEIR LIVELIHOOD. Insurance is an innovation for the spreading of unpredictable risk in a NORMAL, MODERATE republic.

In other words, insurance is not THEM. IT IS US. Allow a horde of barbarians to loot our economy, under cover of the class hatred fiction that "We are only robbing 'Big Insurance'", and our economy will wither and die. This is the agenda of some in the legal profession, especially in our nearly-hopelessly-corrupted academic institutions. But most tort lawyers, like most barbarians, are driven by pure greed.

Before our republic and its economy is brought down by these barbarian hordes, they must be stopped. It's THAT simple. And hiding behind the fiction that they are fighting "Big Insurance", "Big Pharma", and every other left wing-created propaganda myth, only enhances the chances of successful pillaging by these barbarians, and making America's collapse complete.

Against that great disaster, we can afford YEARS of missing those real offenses-by that small minority of unscrupulous entities-until we can be certain that we have ELIMINATED the critical threat against the heart and soul of a country that is the last hope for liberty and peace in the world. We have arrived at a point where the COMPLETE COLLAPSE of our tort law system-requiring a reformed system to be rebuilt from scratch after we are ABSOLUTELY ASSURED that the crises has been solved-is a cost so small as to be unmeasurable. Indeed the complete closing of ALL civil-law courts for ten years is fast becoming America's last and least expensive line of defense against the tort lawyer enemy that is poised to loot us out of existence...



To: ThirdEye who wrote (324170)11/30/2002 2:25:08 AM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Do you think government should be responsible for the damage they do or not?

Or is only the private sector responsible?

For example, what if lawyers started suing the public school systems
across America on behalf of students who have received a bad education?
i.e., "educational malpractice" lawsuits?