SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (69193)12/3/2002 12:28:22 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
He qualified the term "important" as requiring a specific context,

if he did, I missed that. Because that's the point I've been making all along. Important and trivial depend on the context. They are not absolute. This is where we came in. His first post claimed that anyone who said the differences between men and beasts were unimportant was being ridiculous, and I said it depended on the context, that to a hungry lion the difference was only in how fast they could run and whether they had weapons, and no other difference matters to the hungry lion.



To: one_less who wrote (69193)12/3/2002 1:42:48 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 82486
 
He who defines the context, defines importance then- which is, of course, entirely subjective.