Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neeka who wrote (325692)	12/4/2002 2:09:43 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

moenmac, That wasn't even a link to my post...

To: Neeka who wrote (325692)	12/4/2002 2:44:50 PM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Please provide a link that illustrates a change in rhetoric on his (Jake Straw's) or anyone from the GOP guilty of this so called hypocrisy I have some doubts that I'll do that. Finding GOP election quotes four+ years old [to tie it to Clinton] in the morass of links out there is not a pleasant thought. I have to answer the question, how much effort is that worth and would it make any difference? PS The last paragraph of your post was childish. Perhaps. But I'm getting increasingly irritated at this charade we're all playing [I've played it as well]. What does substituting $, %, ^ , for letters really accomplish? What are we pretending we're doing by it? If it's an inappropriate word, inserting a couple of s doesn't make it appropriate. Use the word or don't use the word. jttmab