SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The New Economy and its Winners -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (15156)12/4/2002 7:51:55 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 57684
 
Which start-ups will win funding next?

By Neal Learner
Special to The Christian Science Monitor
from the December 02, 2002 edition

Want to boost your prospects for landing venture capital to fund a start-up in tough times?

Despite the recent dotcom bust, your best bet may still be a lean, customer-driven technology company based in California's Silicon Valley.

But be prepared to bring an airtight business plan and a gleaming résumé to the negotiating table.

"The more seasoned entrepreneurs, who have done it before are certainly getting a closer look in this environment than first-timers," says Bob Grady, general partner of the Carlyle Group, a venture-capital firm in San Francisco.

The soggy economy and volatile stock market has dampened entrepreneurial activity. Slightly more than $1 billion in venture capital was invested in early-phase start-ups in the third quarter of this year, compared with $9 billion in the first quarter of 2000, during the height of the dotcom boom, according to a recent MoneyTree survey, which tracks venture-capital trends.

Only 159 initial start-ups were funded during the past three months, down from 214 companies in the previous quarter, says the survey, released jointly by PricewaterhouseCoopers, Venture Economics, and the National Venture Capital Association. By contrast, 950 start-ups were funded during the early months of 2000, says Mr. Grady.

Grady says the first thing his firm looks for is a "strong and mature management team," followed by signs the company has already gained traction in the marketplace. Forging alliances with established companies can help. "We feel it is easier for a young company to sell - perhaps on the back of someone [established] - as opposed to going out and creating a sales force from scratch," Grady says.

"The big difficulty for start-ups is they need customer traction in order to get funded, and often they need funding in order to get customers interested in them," says Joel Wiggins, director of the Austin Technology Incubator at the University of Texas at Austin.

Mr. Wiggins adds that it takes more than simply a good idea to get funding in today's economy. "Companies need to live longer on their own money before attracting outside capital," he says. "This causes them to be more focused, frugal, and customer-driven. This is good."

Business incubators, which provide everything from office space and copy machines to technical support and financial guidance, remain a popular place for start-ups to hone their edge before seeking venture capital dollars.

Take, for example, the Center for Emerging Technologies in St. Louis, Mo. Currently 14 tenants - ranging from new start-ups to companies with 90-plus employees - occupy the 92,000 square-foot facility. The center focuses on helping biomedical start-ups, says Marcia Mellitz, president of the center that is affiliated with St. Louis University, Washington University, and the University of Missouri in St. Louis.

Raising money has not been easy for these enterprises, she acknowledges. "They haven't been the real sexy ones like the dotcoms," Ms. Mellitz says. "But on the other hand, they are all still alive. They have weathered the storm."

Indeed, start-up biotechnology firms saw the second-highest level of investment activity last quarter, with 18 companies receiving $137 million, according to the MoneyTree survey. Start-up software firms again attracted the most attention from venture capitalists, with 46 companies receiving $187 million.

Silicon Valley companies earned the lion's share from the dwindling funding pot, with 161 deals totaling $1.4 billion last quarter. The Bay Area region was followed by New England, with 81 deals totaling $560 million, and the Southeast, with 68 deals totaling $469 million. Overall, venture-capital investment declined 26 percent from the prior quarter.

Still, many experts agree the current contraction - if not carried too far - is not all bad.

A slower investment pace will let entrepreneurs and investors "build better-quality companies," says Allan Ferguson, general partner at 3I, an international venture-capital firm. "Good entrepreneurs are back in the marketplace and the ones looking to make a quick buck have gone to look elsewhere. We see this as a positive step."

For their part, venture capitalists know they may have to nurture a business for four years or longer before they see a return on their investments. That has led most to become increasingly selective, says Jeanne Metzger, vice president of business development and public affairs for the National Venture Capital Association.

But some experts worry that venture capitalists are becoming too cautious.

The formal venture-capital community "has pulled in its horns considerably," says Larry Cox, director of research at the Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership in Kansas City, Mo.

"They no longer are throwing money at companies that had no chance of being profitable just on the strategy that if they could carve out a space, it would eventually become profitable," says Mr. Cox. "But on the other hand, you would hope that the pendulum wouldn't swing too far so that people are so cautious that they are unwilling to invest in really good ideas."

csmonitor.com



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (15156)12/4/2002 11:22:59 PM
From: Bill Harmond  Respond to of 57684
 
Kinda says it.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (15156)12/5/2002 10:11:52 AM
From: Bill Harmond  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 57684
 
Sombody lit a fire under VeriSign.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (15156)12/5/2002 12:14:28 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 57684
 
Larry's Stealth Storage Startup

Byte and Switch
December 03, 2002
byteandswitch.com

Oracle Corp. CEO Larry Ellison has personally invested a huge chunk of cash -- to the tune of at least $100 million -- in Pillar Data Systems, a stealth-mode startup developing a next-generation NAS storage system.


Pillar Data's sole investor is Lawrence Investments LLC, Ellison's private equity investment firm that specializes in technology and biotechnology industries. Besides a corpulent bankroll, Pillar Data has an experienced management team with IBM Corp. (NYSE: IBM - message board) bloodlines.

It isn't clear precisely what Larry's storage startup is up to, as it is still nine months to a year away from delivering a product. But that's not to say it doesn't have grand (grandiose?) visions: Michael Workman, Pillar Data's president and CEO, isn't shy about saying that the long-term goal is for the company to become a "Fortune 500 storage company." In other words, Pillar Data wants to be the next EMC Corp. (NYSE: EMC - message board) or Network Appliance Inc. (Nasdaq: NTAP - message board) when it grows up.

"We're not a technology play where we're trying to sell ourselves to somebody in 12 to 18 months," he says.

Workman says the company is developing an integrated hardware and software system that provides both NAS and SAN functions, and will scale from 1 Tbyte to "hundreds of terabytes." About 80 percent of the company's efforts are centered on software, he says. What's the difference between Pillar Data and the scads of others in this market? The system, Workman promises, will be "cost-effective at acquisition and extremely cost-effective vis-à-vis administration and management."

Some other clues to what Pillar Data is cooking up can be found in the job listings section on its Website. The startup is looking for engineers to develop "SAN Command and Control Module" software; block protocol developers for its "SAN target device"; engineers to design and test "Pillar Data's file system"; and a senior engineer to "design and implement key portions of the Inter-Process and Inter-Node messaging and Data Movement functions as well as the software that drives the InfiniBand hardware." [Ed. note: That's a pretty hefty load of technologies to be cramming into one package, no?]

Pillar Data won't divulge details of the technologies it's using in its system, nor will it discuss partners it is working with. "If I tell you we're using Serial ATA, then we'll become known as, 'Hey, you're the Serial ATA guys,' " Workman says. However, he will say that the system is not based on InfiniBand anymore, an adjustment Pillar Data made relatively quickly: "It took us just three weeks to switch from InfiniBand to our current fabric." He declined to say what the current fabric was.

The company started life as Digital Appliance Corp., an Ellison-backed storage "think tank" with engineering operations in Israel. It changed its name to Pillar Data in August 2001, and the company shut down its lab in Israel in October 2002. "The skill talent pool over there vis-à-vis what we're developing was not the best," Workman says. "So we decided to move all our operations to the U.S." [Ed. note: Vis-à-vis Workman's comments, clearly he's fond of a certain expression française.]

Currently, Pillar Data has 175 employees, of which around 130 are engineers. The company is based in Milpitas, Calif., and has offices in San Jose, Calif., and Longmont, Colo.

Steve Duplessie, senior analyst at The Enterprise Storage Group Inc., says Pillar Data is the result of Ellison's plan to build a high-powered server for hosting Oracle software. "Originally, Larry wanted them to become the megaserver during his 'thin client' days," he says. "What he needed was a server that could scale infinitely but always be seen as a 'single' system."

Pillar Data, he says, is now in the "next-generation NAS" category: Its system provides a single NAS image that scales "from here to Timbuktu in every dimension -- capacity, bandwidth, and I/O -- automatically as you add 'bricks,' " says Duplessie. "Très cool."

Maybe. But Pillar Data certainly isn't alone in trying to build a supposedly infinite storage architecture. And it's worth noting that other next-generation NAS storage startups, for the most part, haven't proven themselves viable contenders. Companies in this space include BlueArc Corp., ClariStor Inc. (formerly Agile Storage), Isilon Systems, LeftHand Networks, Panasas Inc., Spinnaker Networks Inc., and Zambeel Inc. -- in all, a group that has had its share of stumbles (see Agile Plods Ahead, Spinnaker Shoves Off, 30 Zambeelians Get Pink Slips, and Panasas Pipes in $28M).

Meanwhile, the track record of high-scale SAN storage startups is even less encouraging. These would-be competitors to EMC's Symmetrix and Hitachi Data Systems (HDS)'s Lightning include 3PARdata Inc., the defunct Cereva Networks, and the still-in-limbo YottaYotta Inc. (see 3PAR Swings Club, YottaYotta Still in the Game?, and Cereva Sells Out to EMC).

As one industry observer asks rhetorically: "Does the world need or want another HDS, EMC, NetApp competitor?"

Another source, who is familiar with the company, says Pillar Data's notion of the current market prices for NAS and SAN storage arrays diverges drastically from reality. "They have a large number of IBMers and they have a large checking account compliments of Larry -- neither of which are necessarily formulas for success," the executive says.

ESG's Duplessie acknowledges that Pillar Data does not have a unique strategy. "They are no longer the only guys thinking about this, but they're smart -- and they do have Uncle Larry behind them," he says.

Workman says the company is being cautious and deliberate in how it approaches the market. For example, he says, Pillar Data took nine months to develop its market-requirements document before the engineers wrote a single line of code. "We realize time-to-market is important, but getting it right and delivering on the value proposition is better," he says. Plus, "we have a really good opportunity to see where people will stumble."

Each of the company's senior managers has IBM family ties. Workman was formerly VP of worldwide development for IBM's storage technology division and was also VP of OEM storage subsystems at Big Blue. In addition, he was CTO of Conner Peripherals, a hard-drive maker acquired by Seagate Technology Inc. in 1996. According to Pillar Data, Workman holds over fifteen technology patents and has a Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Stanford University. (He also has a dachshund named Waffles -- whose "real" name, we're told, is "Clams" [ed. note: some kind of inside joke, we suspect] -- Pillar Data's official mascot.)

Pillar Data's other executives include COO Nancy Holleran, who also hails from Conner Peripherals and IBM, where she served in various management roles. Mark D'Apice, senior VP of research and development, was previously VP of development for IBM's OEM storage and subsystems group, worked at Mylex Corp. (acquired by LSI Logic Corp. [NYSE: LSI]), and was a founder of CyberStorage Systems (Storage Computer Corp. [AMEX: SOS]). Finally, Ronald von Trapp, senior VP of sales and marketing, was most recently VP of sales at Gadzoox Networks Inc. (OTC: ZOOX - message board). Von Trapp previously held sales positions at companies including IBM, Quantum Corp. (NYSE: DSS - message board), Maxtor Corp. (NYSE: MXO - message board), Mylex, and Vixel Corp. (Nasdaq: VIXL - message board).

The startup's board of directors includes Ellison, Workman, Steven Fink (the CEO of Lawrence Investments), and Philip Simon, who is a consultant for Lawrence Investments and acts as Pillar Data's "titular CFO," Workman says.

Lawrence Investments, Workman notes, is not associated with Oracle at all -- so it's not as if Pillar Data is creating some kind of super-charged Oracle database platform. "It's Larry's personal investment," he says.

And having Larry Ellison as the company's single financial backer is a huge advantage, Workman claims [ed. note: though he would say that, wouldn't he?], since the company doesn't have to deal with fire-breathing VCs. "We're not at the confluence of pressure from investors and the need to sell something. It's a tough time even for the big guys to sell stuff," he says. "Larry is committed to building this company."

We'll check back in a few months, then, and see how well Pillar Data is holding up its end of the bargain -- and whether Ellison remains so steadfastly committed to the company.

— Todd Spangler, US Editor, Byte and Switch
byteandswitch.com