SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (155725)12/5/2002 3:16:23 PM
From: g_w_north  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1583396
 
<(if this were not the case, he would do just as Clinton did, and ignore the proliferation of WMD by Iraq). >

I want to know how Republicans believe the previous administration should have reacted to Iraq. Does anybody really believe that Bush would have pushed America to the brink of war had the economy stayed the course and September 11th not happened? (I'm talking about Iraq not Al Qaeda).



To: i-node who wrote (155725)12/5/2002 4:41:48 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583396
 
Running a nation by polls is NOT a good thing to do. And there is absolutely NO evidence to suggest that the current administration is "run by polls".

Once again you're in denial. Mr. Bush couldn't run fast enough to the UN after the polls came out showing that's what the majority of Americans favored.

Mr. Bush comes from a long line of politicos.......it's what he does best; that and cheerleading.

ted


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News