SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Home on the range where the buffalo roam -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sig who wrote (10067)12/7/2002 4:41:31 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 13815
 
12/06/02: Market Monitor -Frank Cochrane, President of Investment Timing Consultants

PAUL KANGAS: My guest Market Monitor this week is Frank Cochrane, President of Investment Timing Consultants, an investment advisory firm based in Farmington Hills, Michigan.

And welcome back to NIGHTLY BUSINESS REPORT, Frank.

FRANK COCHRANE, PRESIDENT, INVESTMENT TIMING CONSULTANTS: It's great to be here, Paul. Thank you very much.

KANGAS: On your last visit with us, May 10 of this year, with the Dow around the 10,000 level, you shocked many of our viewers by predicting it would fall as low as 5,500 during the following six months. And it got almost halfway down that level, 7,100, in early October. Has the eight week rally we witnessed recently softened your bearish stance?

COCHRANE: Short-term, Paul, I'm bullish. I think we could have a rally going into mid-January. However, longer term, I think what this eight week rally has done is basically delayed the inevitable. I think next year, the next six, 12 months or so, the market will work lower. We'll go below the levels that we were in early October.

KANGAS: Why so bearish still?

COCHRANE: Valuation I think is the key. The Fed has basically done everything they can do. They can lower rates a bit more, but the market is still very expensive. We had a huge bubble and build up in this market in the mid to late '90s. I think a correcting process has to occur, will occur. This may take several more years. We may do a lot of churning activity. But the volatility is going to be there. We're going to see some huge up moves and some huge down moves. But I think a person has to be very proactive, very nimble and very dedicated to managing their portfolio in a manner that they just keep on watching everything every single day. The days of buy and hold, I think, are gone for a long, long time.

KANGAS: So you see us in a secular or long-term bear market, but it could be punctuated by some cyclical or very handsome bull markets in the short-term?

COCHRANE: Absolutely. We've seen some great gains here. For example, Intel (INTC) from $12 to $20.

KANGAS: Right.

COCHRANE: IBM (IBM) from the low $50s up to almost $90.

KANGAS: And do you think this rally that we've seen recently still has legs?

COCHRANE: Yes, do I. I think that the market will rally, as we saw today, based upon the news of the day.

KANGAS: Yes, it did well.

COCHRANE: And should some year end 401K money, that type of thing, going into the market, and a Santa Claus rally, that effect, I think, should last until mid-January. But then I would be real, real cautious.

KANGAS: OK. Now, the last time you were with us in May, you said hold onto some previous recommendations you made, which were way up, Northrop (NOC), United Technologies (UTX). And they still are doing well. Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) hasn't done anything. Are you still with any of those?

COCHRANE: I would hold onto them here certainly, especially given the geopolitical situation.

KANGAS: You liked the golds, Newmont Mining (NEM), Barrick <Company: Barrick Gold Corporation; Ticker: ABX; URL: barrick.com; and Gold Fields (GFI), and they all had big run-ups after you were here in May. But now they're back even a little below where they were. You still like them?

COCHRANE: I think gold stocks will do extremely well next year. Most commodities will do well next year. So I would --

KANGAS: And you recommended actually shorting the Qs, which turned out to be profitable, and IBM when it was $82, it went down to $55, profitable. Dell Computer (DELL), though, has hung in there pretty good. What about those three?

COCHRANE: It's done real well and I think that stock will basically hold its own, although I wouldn't buy it here.

KANGAS: OK.

COCHRANE: Again, what I would do with those types of stocks is trade them. Look at the high range, look at the low range and trade on that basis.

KANGAS: OK. Any new recommendations here? What kind of strategy?

COCHRANE: I would continue, I would look at oil stocks, stocks in the XOI. I would look at shorting IBM in the high $80s.

KANGAS: Still again? OK.

COCHRANE: Buy back the low $50s, low $60s. Intel -- the ETFs, I would look at shorting those and buying those. This is a market to be traded.

KANGAS: OK.

COCHRANE: Those people that do that will be rewarded.

KANGAS: Do you or any of your personal interests have positions in these recommendations you're making?

COCHRANE: Not at all.

KANGAS: None of them?

COCHRANE: No.

KANGAS: OK. So in other words, you're still, you're still looking for a 5,500 Dow eventually?

COCHRANE: I think eventually. It may take a year --

KANGAS: What about NASDAQ? 800? That's what you said last time.

COCHRANE: Yes. I think NASDAQ 800 and I think somewhere in the 500 to 600 range on the S&P.

KANGAS: OK.

COCHRANE: Eventually. Again, and trade this market. Be very, very nimble.

KANGAS: Be nimble. Jack be nimble, Jack be quick.

COCHRANE: Exactly, Paul.

KANGAS: All right, Frank, thanks very much.

Thank you.

KANGAS: My guest Market Monitor, Frank Cochrane, President of Investment Timing Consultants.

nightlybusinessreport.org



To: Sig who wrote (10067)12/8/2002 10:04:49 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13815
 
Strategies from the Best Stockpickers

Saturday December 7, 9:23 pm ET
By Linda Stern

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - From here on out, the stock market may be somewhat less dismal, but it will be no less bumpy. And, anyone who has ever made -- or lost -- money in volatile markets knows that it's important to have a strategy.

Investors who jump from theory to theory or change their strategy with the latest CNBC reports will, as the saying goes, get slaughtered while the bulls and the bears make money.

It's not always easy to define a strategy, but a book published earlier this year can help.

"The Market Gurus" by John Reese and Todd Glassman (2002, Dearborn Trade Publishing), spells out the strategies employed by some of the most famous and methodical investors in U.S. stock market history.

It's a nice book for investors who are serious about scouring the market for good stocks, because it spells out the exact criteria by which the Warren Buffetts, Martin Zweigs and Peter Lynches of the world came by their fortunes.

It's as if each star investor wrote a chapter opening his own magic box of strategies. And every detail is summarized in a grand final chapter called "the famous ratios" which lists and explains the numbers that can point the way to good stocks.

For example, there's not one of the famous investors who doesn't look at some measure of a company's intrinsic value. Most looked at the ratio of a company's share price to its earnings, either as a stand-alone statistic or in relation to other figures.

For example, Benjamin Graham, the father of value investing, liked companies with PE ratios under 15. Peter Lynch only looked at the PE of those firms with sales exceeding $1 billion, and he wanted them to have PEs under 40.

That gives you a much longer list of companies, but not the whole universe.

Even William O'Neil, the publisher of Investor's Business Daily who is famous for loving fast growing companies and stocks that are moving up quickly, likes to look at PE and compare it to how fast a company's earnings are growing. In his estimation, a high price/earnings ratio is okay if it is exceeded by the company's annual earnings growth rate.

That ratio is called PEG.

What about Warren Buffett, probably the most lauded investor still trading today? He doesn't look at PE, or O'Neil's PEG, or price-to-sales or yield, other measures you'd expect a traditional value investor to use. Instead, Buffett really scours a company's debts, and buys shares only in firms that can pay off their long-term debt with two years of net earnings... last year's earnings. His ratio? Long- term debt must be less than twice last year's earnings.

In fact, all but one of the famous investors steered clear of companies with high debt loads, though each had his own way of measuring that.

Other factors that pointed star investors to star stocks? Fast earnings growth. Solid dividends. Growing sales. Anyone willing to do a little homework (and homework is much easier to do with online stock screening sites available today), can put together their own strategy from the useful information in this book and build a portfolio likely to deliver gains over the long haul.

The authors points are informative, but they deliver one lesson more than they probably wish they had. Their own, analytical Web site, validea.com -- which spawned the book and is referred to at the beginning and end of the volume -- is inactive, and for all intents and purposes, defunct.

That doesn't make their information invalid. It just seems their own company didn't measure up to those winning ratios.

(Linda Stern is a freelance writer who covers personal finance issues for Reuters. Any opinions in the column are solely those of Ms. Stern. You can e-mail her at lindastern(at)aol.com).

biz.yahoo.com