Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (60383)	12/7/2002 1:21:23 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

The White House is therefore able to call on General Tommy Franks, commander of the Iraqi sector, to produce the evidence needed to prove Iraq?s mountainous declaration false. All the general needs do is to order the elite unit guarding any one of the 16 squares to seize a weapons system, possibly with its Iraqi crew. I don't think we are this good, but maybe so. It is just too good to be true.

To: Ilaine who wrote (60383)	12/7/2002 1:23:26 PM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No need to really answer. #1 That means they didn't have any evidence 3-4 months ago when they said they had it. (Is it OK with you that they were intellectually dishonest when they told us they had evidence?) #2. If we now know where all the crap is, why do we have to go to war? #3 Why haven't these reports been shared with the Weapons Inspectors? #4 Knowing we have intelligence, now, how does this change our current strategy? #5 Has this information been shared with the world community, the UN, the security council? Why?