SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (326778)12/8/2002 9:59:00 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Respond to of 769670
 
Another way to look at it is Landrieu only managed to get from 46% on Nov 5 to 51% last night Terrell went from 27% to 49%. The sugar cane thing proved critical, an issue that was literally dropped in their lap. I heard the article had appeared in a Mexican newspaper...? Where was everybody on this?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (326778)12/8/2002 10:32:44 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
LOL---hey Kboy, I knew you would show up. One squeaker election in a HEAVY Democratic state and you call it "a big defeat", I hear even Landriu's daddy was driving all day , wonder who he was taking to the polls? ROFL...I can hear McMauliffe on all the Sunday shows now spouting how great a victory this was....wonder why they did not let clinton do anything but go to the blacks to bring em up off the farm to vote?? Heck even Landriu would not be seen with him, but they sure know how to pull the strings on the minorities don't they? How many times do you think clinto will ever be back to Louisiana now??



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (326778)12/8/2002 11:27:33 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
Three Democrat "holds": S. Dakota, New Jersey, and Louisianna, may keep the party lulled into staying glued to the Marxist/Leninist enemy for a while longer. But they actually KNOW that 2 of those "holds", LA and SD, were due to the usual crooked election techniques and fabricated votes. The corner has been turned on election corruption after the Gore obscenities of 2000, and the Dems downfall will be accelerated if they still think they can fabricate their way back into power.

As for Bush, he's got what he needs: Control of both houses, a pending 60% landslide less than 2 years away, and an even more favorable Senate race environment for 2004.

It worked in 2002. It will work even better in 2004...



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (326778)12/8/2002 12:34:56 PM
From: ManyMoose  Respond to of 769670
 
No, a crapshoot with even odds -- a squeeker for the democrats that got lucky.

big defeat for Republicans and Bush