To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (18344 ) 12/8/2002 7:24:16 PM From: Brumar89 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23908 Bullshit, Len. The facts you were questioning were basic key key elements of the "whole event". I'll repeat:Now as to you where you insinuated - that's in the recent posts like those below. Your meaning is pretty clear - 6 million didn't die, there were no mass graves, the ovens couldn't have burned so many people. Sure you pose your insinuations as questions, as doubts - but that's just so you can deny what you're up to when you're called on it. A chicken shit tactic. To:Robert Barry who wrote (18076) From: len grasso Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 2:02 PM View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18234 Where does the six million figure come from? A number passed down and put forward from "scholar" to scholar and book to book? and To:epsteinbd who wrote (18134) From: len grasso Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 2:59 PM View Replies (1) | Respond to of 18235 Are you admitting there were no mass graves? I question everything, especially when I know how "facts" are embellished and there is a strong incentive and reward to do so. and To:epsteinbd who wrote (18144) From: len grasso Tuesday, Dec 3, 2002 3:27 PM View Replies (2) | Respond to of 18235 High tech? Those dinky ovens are high tech? The Nazis would yet be firing those biscuit burners today in order to kill six million cats. Doubt is good when there are scoundrels about, even if the US Army is involved, especially if the US Army is involved. Can you place this quotation, Len? ...the Holocaust was the most extreme atrocity in human history, and we lose our humanity if we are even willing to enter the arena of debate with those who seek to deny or underplay Nazi crimes.