Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (208430)	12/8/2002 8:19:44 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Grace I think O'Neill was an asset to this administration. For a to long time we had scam artists and manipulators at the helm of the US Treasury. At least he was a straight shooter and knowledgeable man. Unfortunate the thieves and swindlers in the financial markets only like to have their own sleek types of swindlers as the head of the US Treasury There was a real reason why under Rubin / Clinton the stock market got ballistic and now O'Neill must pay for Rubin / Clinton bad deeds, if not outright criminal actions. The monkeys on WS and the major banks have an hideous mentality and attitude........ if you do not play ball with the thieves and swindlers you ARE DOOMED Honesty and knowledge do not earn you kudos in Washington political circles or WS ........ honesty and virtue is preached to the working classes to be better exploited.

To: GraceZ who wrote (208430)	12/8/2002 8:21:50 PM
From: maceng2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Dude, O'Neal's days have been numbered for some time So what was wrong with O'Neill? Didn't he know how to turn around economic situations in business (Alcoa) or something? Inquiring minds wish to know. /edit just checked the spelling btw. it's O'Neill /edit edit. Haim seems to have the picture...

To: GraceZ who wrote (208430)	12/9/2002 1:36:04 AM
From: lifeisgood	Respond to of 436258

As for up looking suspicious, bears think all up is suspicious as if down were the only natural direction. Grace, Never underestimate the power of what you don't know. best... LIG

To: GraceZ who wrote (208430)	12/9/2002 9:18:53 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

<<Dude, O'Neal's days have been numbered for some time. Bush kept him just long enough to make it look like he gave him a chance and he hadn't made a big blunder in having chosen him in the first place. His leaving could hardly be seen as a negative.>> Dudette, Maybe you knew that, but I didn't, and I'm sure most didn't. To see his resignation( could hardly be seen as a negative,) as being wildly bullish instantly is a very large stretch. And as today showed , it wasn't bullish at all. So there....