SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (60669)12/9/2002 4:22:51 AM
From: Bilow  Respond to of 281500
 
Hi LindyBill; A comment on the Iraqis and their inability to document how they destroyed some of their missing WMDs.

For those who would suggest that "WMDs are not marmalade", I provide this informative link that would suggest that even the world's leading country can't keep track of its WMDs:

INEEL team identifies mystery munitions
After rusty, World War II-era U.S. warheads were uncovered on the Solomon Islands, the Army called in experts from DOE’s Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory. Nuclear physicist Gus Caffrey and three colleagues assessed the 109 warheads this summer on Johnston Atoll, 800 miles southwest of Hawaii--without opening the munitions up. They identified the warhead contents with the Portable Isotopic Neutron Spectroscopy (PINS) system, which Caffrey developed. PINS emits neutrons that bounce into the elements of a chemical agent, producing a signature pattern of gamma rays. They discovered that the warheads contain mustard gas, and can be safely destroyed in the Johnston Atoll chemical weapons incinerator.

ornl.gov

More links for the same discovery:
exn.ca

So when Iraq says they have "no" WMDs, I doubt that they're telling the truth. They, like the US itself, probably has rusty shit stacked away in forgotten warehouses, or badly disposed of in hastily dug holes in the ground.

But is it really moral to hold Iraq to a standard that even we are unable to achieve?

-- Carl



To: LindyBill who wrote (60669)12/9/2002 9:55:00 AM
From: Rascal  Respond to of 281500
 
"..no new evidence to support Iraq's contention that it destroyed biological and chemical weapons in the 1990s.."

I am having trouble proving I threw out my garbage last week.

You know, "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

Rascal@it'sallcomingbacktomenow.com