Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (69555)	12/9/2002 2:14:12 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"(assuming we could all agree on what "good" was, which we can't - but we can try)." Well we have been down this path before. People in the world generally agree that sharing and caring is a "good." Bout the time we find our selves doing a magnificent job we find some other peops don't like what we're doing. We never get to the point where sharing and caring for my peops turns out to be good for all the other peops. Sharing and caring to much for the other peops can be labeled "treason" or "neglect of my own peops" or some other nasty thing. On principle the idea to have a world of good is simple and righteous. I prefer to always stand on principle when dealing with issues of good world/bad world. In practice it is complicated and a unique situation for each of us. And since we will never have control over the 6billion plus other peops ideas about how they intend to do their good sharing and caring, I remain the most skeptical.